Media
culture plays a large part in the way we think of gender and class. What is
thought of as “proper gender roles” within a nuclear family is largely due to
the portrayal of families in the media. The ideal is considered to be the male
as the head of the household, with the stay at home wife and homemaker. Father
knows best, The Dick Van Dyke show and Leave it to Beaver are examples of the ideal
patriarchy within the American family. In the 1960s and extending into today,
gender and class became more intertwined. More affluent men were being shown as
successful and happy, while working class men are shown as a caricature of
cartoonish idiocy. There was an emergence of lower class men being portrayed as
lazy and/or uneducated, and the rhetoric behind this character development
suggests that the poor are poor because of their own shortcomings and
decisions. In America there is the belief that there is social mobility and Americans
can better themselves through hard work and persistence. Beyond the satire of
the bumbling working class father figure, the reality of poverty and the
increasing wealth gap are ignored as economic factors affecting real Americans
status in life.
In
class we have been focusing on sitcoms and the changing male gender roles within
them. I personally don’t like sitcoms, I find laugh tracks extremely cheesy and
offensive to the intellect of the audience (I don’t need to be told when to
laugh, thank you). In the spirit of sitcom hatred I have decided to look at
male gender and class roles within cartoons, more specifically, South Park.
“Poor”
and working class Americans in shows tend to be employed in blue collar occupations.
Peter Griffin, for example, embodies the clumsy stupid working class man who
has a factory job at a toy manufacturing plant. He is constantly messing up,
and after Opie (obviously mentally handicapped employee) is put in charge of
training Peter, thus making the suggestion that Peter is so dumb a retard could
do his job. Homer Simpson is another example of the buffoon like working class
male character. Both are constantly getting hired, and fired, job stability
really isn’t their thing.
South
Park manages to show representations of all classes, and the heads of all the
families in the show are part of different social classes. Randy Marsh is the
epitome of the middle class working father. He works in a semi-blue collar job
as a geologist, while not being very smart in most situations. Kyle’s dad,
Gerald Broflovski, is a very successful lawyer, which is also in
contrast to Kenny’s dad, who is a raging alcoholic with way too many children.
Alternately Cartman, who doesn’t have a dad at all (except for a hermaphrodite
mom), may be viewed as the “product” of a single parent household: loud, fat,
and always in trouble. While South Park is obviously mocking gender and class
roles, the fear of children becoming incompliant due to a lack of father figure
is embodied in Cartman, and is a general fear expressed in a society with an
increasing number of single parent households. I don’t think mothers in the
real world actually worry about their children becoming Cartman. Personally, I
have never heard anyone say “Oh my God I need a man because my child might turn
out like Cartman,” however his character may play on the fears of society as to
the consequences of raising a child without a dominant male figure in their
life.
The
father-son relationship is also emphasized in South Park. Traditionally boys
are more “wanted” then girls and the relationships between the father figures
and their children reflect that. Randy is constantly trying to be cool to his
son. Back in the day, fathers and sons were shown fishing and hunting; in South
Park, their father-son activities include World of Warcraft and boy bands,
either way this shows the ideal bond between father and son. The male figures
in South Park are also responsible for discussing sexuality with their sons (as
shown in the Backdoor sluts 9 episode), while women’s sexuality isn’t directly
addressed until the “Eat, Pray, Queef” episode, which didn’t air until season
13 episode 4.
Finally,
it is considered the role of the male to make decisions that make their family
more “ideal”. One could argue that increasingly it is women who make these
decisions, however within the media women are not portrayed as such. Since male
gender roles in the media is what I’m writing about, the reality of the increasing
power of women in the household is a moot point. This is also an example of how
the media does not always reflect life in the real world. An example of Randy
trying to build the ideal family is in the episode “All About the Mormons.”
When the Marshes have dinner with Stan's new friends family, Randy wants to
look good compared to the “perfect” Mormon family they are dining with. He
makes sure his family looks nice and plays nice, and even finds himself embarrassed
when Stan calls him out on this fact at dinner. Another character, Kenny’s mom,
is also constantly nagging her husband over money, presumably because she also
wants to live the “American dream.” Kenny’s dad, as a raging alcoholic, doesn’t
ever seem to be able to provide for his family in a non-sketchy way. In contrast Gerald Broflovski is able to
better his family because he is considered an affluent character. He starts
taking on sexual harassment lawsuits in public schools, and as a result is able
to build an even bigger and bigger house, albeit at the expense of others
(Gerald is pretty much the 1% of South Park). This goes back to Kenny’s dad
being portrayed as poor because of his drinking and poor work ethic, whereas
Gerald is educated and able to get ahead in life. Stan’s dad just never knows what’s
going on and falls somewhere in the middle.
Despite
the fact that Randy and Sharon Marsh are based on Trey Parkers parents Randy
and Sharon, the plotlines in South Park are not fully representative of
American life, but it is a good example of gender and class roles and their
portrayal in the T.V. media.
I agree that the character types are damamging to an overall view on a particular culture. Sadly though, in most cases I find that these shows are trying to bring out the truth of the matter. I am certain, specifically in South Park, that these character types are intended to show that a portion of the U.S. has chosen to bow out of becoming well educated. There is nothing wrong with that to a certain extent. Except where South Park is concerned, they are trying to imply that these people vote, causing problems within our overall culture. I would rather a sect of people not vote if they are not educated enough to understand what a particular party stands for besides religion and gun rights.
ReplyDeleteBut, while focusing on this group may bring out the truths, they also cause a consistant sort of predjudice towards these groups. Predjudice tends to lead towards losing rights.
I come from a blue collar family. I am proud of that. I can vouch for them when I say, that at least they have taken the time to educate themselves enough to understand the underlying issues and to be able to have a well rounded intellectual conversation. On the otherhand, I cannot say the same for some of the people I meet.